top of page

Roger Martin on the high price of efficiency



Diane Brady chats with Roger Martin


What problem are you trying to solve with this book?

Median incomes in the US are stagnating. People tend to focus on economic growth and GDP per capita, which is the mean or average growth. What I was worried about was a divergence between the two as more and more of the new economic growth went into the pockets of the very rich. When they think of inequality, most people think, “Poor people are getting poorer.” That’s not actually the case. Though I care a whole lot about the poor and how poor they are, they aren’t getting poorer relative to the median. That’s stayed quite stable. What has been completely unstable and going in one direction is the median versus the top 1 percent and the top 10 percent. That was the motivator for the book. I was trying to figure out, “Why? What’s changed?”


What surprised you most about the book?

The thing that probably surprised me most was the result of the Persona Project, a project we did where we interviewed, in ethnographic detail, a bunch of Americans. And the disengagement was startling. The primary-school teacher saying,

“Hey, I got a teacher’s degree. I thought that was what you’re supposed to do. And here I am, barely making ends meet.” It’s more cause to ask, “Is this system working?” One of the things that I think has been good for the country coming out of the pandemic is the notion of all these essential workers. They’re essential, but they don’t make a living wage. So how exactly does that work? It’s not sustainable for an entity to do business in a way that people who are essential to that business aren’t benefiting from it. Living paycheck to paycheck, below a living wage, and worrying about putting food on the table does not make for an employee who can give awesome service.


A take on tech

Is technology a tool for speed or is it creating more obstacles to resiliency?


I think it’s creating more obstacles probably. Aristotle, who created the scientific method, explained something really important that the world has ignored: if you’re going to use the scientific method, it involves crunching data to determine the cause of a given effect. Where’s all the data from? The past. We have no data on the future yet, because it hasn’t happened.




To prioritize one thing and say, “This is the one thing we’re about,” is a recipe for disaster. In a complex, adaptive system, that’s pulling one lever and imagining that you know what that one lever is going to do.

We’re not going to get where we need to be on diversity until such time as we make the most of diverse voices instead of the least.




And what he said is that crunching data is only good for that part of the world where things cannot be other than they are. Take this pen. I can drop it 1,000 times in the past and calculate that it’ll drop in the future because it’s part of the world where things cannot be other than they are. Now, the

problem with using scientific analysis in that world— machine learning, AI [artificial intelligence], and so on—is it will convince you that the future will be what? Identical to the past. Because that’s all science can do—the guy who invented science told us that.


What should a CEO with limited resources prioritize?

One is to prioritize multiple things. To prioritize one thing and say, “This is the one thing we’re about,” is a recipe for disaster. In a complex, adaptive system, that’s pulling one lever and imagining that you know what that one lever is going to do. Two, ask the

sustainability question: “Who is necessary for this business system we’re trying to put together? Who’s necessary for this to prosper? What’s in it for them?”

And make sure that it’s good for everybody else because, otherwise, it is not sustainable; because you’re counting on somebody who is not benefiting from the system you’ve put in place. And then just keep tweaking it and tweaking it. Don’t imagine you can put a system in place and it’ll run for any period

of time, let alone forever.



Diversity is key to resiliency

What’s the recipe for a mindset of resiliency?


I guess I would do an overlay. Philosophy feels to me as the most foundational discipline about how people work, and physics is how things work. You need to know how things and people interact to get ahead in life. I think the great philosophers were system-dynamics people, in essence. They were essentially saying, “We are going to explain to you how this thing called ‘people interacting together’ kind of works.” They were more holistic.


We are not taught how to take advantage of a diverse thought—diverse in the sense that your thought conflicts with mine—rather than saying, “I have an idea. Yours is different than mine. I must make sure mine triumphs,” which is generally what we’re taught to do, to advocate for our point of view. We’re not going to get where we need to be on diversity until such time as we make the most of diverse voices instead of the least. Right now, we make the least of them. And that’s often why if you have 20 people and there are two or three who are thinking differently, they’re likely to feel that they’re being squashed. We have been on a path of reductionism—and this idea that you can prove things.


Roger Martin, noted management thinker and former dean and institute director of the Martin Prosperity Institute at the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management, is based in Canada. Diane Brady is a senior editor in McKinsey’s New York office.

Comments


Search By Tags
Follow Us
  • Facebook Classic
  • Twitter Classic
  • Google Classic

CITINAVI  UK - Global Partners 

Europe - America - Middle East - Caribbean - Asia - Africa  

dmitry zapol.png

Dmitry Zapol

Tax advisory

eric major.jpg

Eric Major

Latitude

Chris Ward portrait.jpg

Chris Ward

InvestIMM

Hakan Cortelek portrait.jpg

Hakan Cortelek

Beyond

Sanjay-Kalra.jpg

Sanjay Kalra

New Delhi

Roderick Cutajar.jpg

Roderick Cutajar

Malta

hudson mckenzie-rahul-batra managing par

Rahul Batra

Hudson & McKenzie

MD BADSHA FAHAD.jpg

Md Badsha Fahad 

             India

Kumar photo 2021.jpg

Kumar C.

Mumbai - Dubai

FREE CONSULTATION

Request a free consultation with an Trusted Advisor

and start your journey for Global Residency-Citizenship planning, Talent migration (artist, digital nomad). we answer within 2 hours followed by whatsapp in real time

Please type in your contact details, so we can contact you back

Hyong-jin Kwon.jpg
Citinavi  logo2 final-.jpg

Hyong-jin KWON.

Founder - Paris

photo- CITINAVI-Shanghai expo Wise 15-17
IREIS booth-logo.jpg

              CITINAVI as Official Media Partner                  global conferences, exhibitions - investment migration

bottom of page